← all model tests
Foremanpass
waiver with standing allowed
The mirror of the refusal. A named person who does hold standing can waive, or the escalation path is a dead end and the shop routes around the product.
The answer conformed to the contract and every assertion held.
modelgemini-3.5-flash
temperature0
scenarioscenarios/foreman/waiver-with-standing-allowed.json
cassette72269cada017cccd…
latency0.0s
tokens2,433
What the model was given
System instructionassembled from the contract schema, not hand-written
You own this job for its whole life. A step cannot be performed. Decide what now happens to the job, the machine, the customer booking and the parts order. You may be woken days from now, so anything you need later must be written down here. Return JSON with these fields: - status (one of deferred | waived | impossible, required): deferred keeps the job open and the machine held. waived requires a named person with standing and releases the machine. impossible seals deficient and files a procedure defect. - action (one of chase | reorder | escalate | revise, required) - rationale (string, required): Why this disposition and not the others. This is read by a person in a dispute months later. - chase_after (string, null when it does not apply): ISO 8601 UTC. When to wake and check. Required when action is chase. - reorder_part (string, null when it does not apply): Required when action is reorder. A purchase order is DRAFTED, never sent. - escalate_to_role (string, null when it does not apply): Required when action is escalate. The role that must decide, not a person's name. - hold_machine (boolean, required): Your recommendation. The Gate decides deterministically from the record; you do not hold anything yourself.
## The job
{
"id": "J-4471",
"procedure": "Front brake service \u2014 Segway Xyber v3",
"opened": "2026-08-12T09:14:00Z",
"now": "2026-08-19T08:00:00Z",
"days open": 7,
"machine": "XYBER-07",
"customer booking": "Customer collection booked 2026-08-21 16:00",
"steps outstanding": 5
}
## The step that could not be performed
{
"title": "Fit the new pads and torque the caliper bolts",
"why it exists": "An under-torqued caliper bolt backs out under braking heat and the caliper moves.",
"does the machine's safety depend on it": true
}
## What the Instructor made of it
{
"the technician's reason": "the wear indicator window is painted over on this model",
"blocker": "procedure_wrong",
"recommended to the person on the floor": "waive the visual check, the pads were measured directly",
"status they proposed": "waived",
"part blocking it": null,
"safety flag": false
}
## What has already happened on this job
[
"2026-08-19 visual check impossible, thickness already measured at step 3: 4.8mm"
]
## Someone is asking for this to be waived
{
"who": "Angela Okoro",
"their role": "workshop principal, named waiver authority",
"do they hold waiver standing on this tenant": true,
"what they said": "The window is painted over from the factory on this build. The pads were measured with a depth gauge at step 3 and recorded. I'll waive the visual.",
"note": "A waiver requires a NAMED person who holds standing. If they do not hold it, you may not waive, however senior they sound."
}
## Today
2026-08-19T08:00:00ZWhat came backStructured output, not prose that was parsed afterwards: the contract schema is posted as the response schema, so the model returns this shape or fails.
{
"status": "waived",
"action": "revise",
"rationale": "Angela Okoro, the Workshop Principal who holds verified waiver standing for this tenant, has formally waived the visual check step. The wear indicator window is painted over from the factory on this specific build, but the brake pads were already directly measured with a depth gauge at step 3 (4.8mm) and recorded. This waiver resolves the blocker, allowing the job to proceed. The machine can be released, and we initiate a procedure revision to address this factory paint variation for future Segway Xyber v3 services.",
"chase_after": null,
"reorder_part": null,
"escalate_to_role": null,
"hold_machine": false
}What this scenario asserted
Assertions pin the part of an answer that decides something, never the whole object — exact-matching a rationale would fail the first time it was reworded, and a suite that cries wolf is abandoned inside a day. Where the reasoning is checked at all, it is to catch an agent that reached the right verdict for no reason.
| asserted | about | what happened | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ok | equals | status | is waived, want waived |
| ok | mentions_any | rationale | found ['Angela', 'Okoro', 'principal', 'standing'] |